Education in and through sport - incorporating TPSR into Play with Purpose
The Teaching
Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR) model was developed by Don
Hellison (2011). It is a framework for learning life skills and for character,
development with the aim that students who are physically educated become responsible,
caring members of their communities. The TPSR model has 5 progressive levels
of responsibility.
The Five
Levels of Responsibility
1.
Respect for the Rights and Feelings of Others
Students at
this level can manage their own behaviour, resolve conflicts peacefully, and
maintain a safe learning environment.
Key behaviours: self-control, listening, not disrupting others.
2.
Participation and Effort
Students at
this level demonstrate enthusiasm, stay on task, and give their best effort regardless
to tasks.
Key behaviours: trying new activities, setting personal effort goals.
3.
Self-Direction
Students at
this level develop the ability to work independently and make constructive
choices about their learning.
Key behaviours: practising on their own, setting goals, self-assessing.
4. Caring
and Leadership
Students at
this level take initiative to help others and contribute positively to the
group.
Key behaviours: encouraging peers, assisting classmates, showing
empathy.
5.
Transfer of Responsibility Beyond the Gym
Students at
this level apply the values learned in physical education to other contexts,
such as to school, home, and community.
Key behaviours: demonstrating responsibility outside class, reflecting
on real-world application.
TPSR foregrounds
building intentional teaching moments into physical education lessons. Four
pedagogies of TPSR are:
- Relational time.
- Awareness talks.
- Physical activity with
responsibility embedded.
- Reflection time.
A recent bibliometric review of TPSR scholarship mapped 124 publications
and reaffirmed TPSR is the central pedagogical model in physical
education for building responsibility, character, and social development (Di
et al., 2023). A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis
synthesizing 20 studies (2005–2023) found that TPSR-based PE programs produce
significant positive emotional and social outcomes for participants. Effects
were demonstrated across key indicators such as emotional regulation, social
connectedness, and prosocial behaviour (Aygun et al., 2024).
Emotional regulation
Social skills
Positive peer interactions
Self-direction
Leadership and empathy
When you combine TPSR’s focus on personal and social growth with Play
with Purpose’s focus on intentional, game‑centred skill learning, you get a
dual‑purpose pedagogical approach:
Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR) model (Levels 1–5: Respect, Participation, Self‑Direction, Caring, Transfer)
Lesson Sequence
Begin with a TPSR Awareness Talk - a brief circle talk to set the tone.
Teacher prompts:
- “Today we are focusing on Respect and Participation.
What does that look like?”
- “How can you show caring during
team play?”
- “At the end, you’ll share one way you can
use these skills outside PE.”
Students give ideas in response to the teacher prompts.
Game 1: Play With Purpose Intent: Learning
to move into space and avoid defenders.
Keep It Moving A 3v1 or 4v1 keep-away game.
Purposeful play focus:
- Move to open space.
- Pass to maintain possession.
Rules:
- Offensive players must move after
they pass (teacher cue: “Pass and go!”).
- Defender tries to intercept.
Progressions:
- Limit touches: 3-touch → 2-touch.
- Add a second defender for challenge.
Practice 1 Setup:
- Divide the court into 3 horizontal zones.
- Two taggers in the centre zone only.
- Players run across zones without
being tagged.
TPSR Integration: look for
and 'call out' students who:
- Praise respectful tagging and safe
movement.
- Encourage caring (“help your partner get
through the zone”).
Practice 2 Setup:
- Gate Passing - Cones form small “gates.” In pairs or trios, students pass the ball through gates while moving.
Purposeful play intent:
- Passing
accuracy
- Communication
- Vision
TPSR links: Teacher call outs:
- Students showing self-direction. Self-direction: students choose which gate to move to next.
- Caring:
partners encourage each other.
Game 2: End‑Zone
Setup:
- Two
teams.
- Teams
score by completing a pass to a teammate in the end zone.
- No
running with the ball—players pivot and pass.
- Who
is showing respect?
- Who
is supporting your teammates?
- Who
is showing self‑direction: manage turnovers and reset quickly.
Key Teaching Cues:
- “Find
space!”
- “Pass
early.”
- “Support
the ball carrier.”
Modifications:
- If
a team is struggling, add a “magic player” who plays for both teams.
- Reduce
or expand playing area as needed.
TPSR links: Teacher looks for:
- Who
is showing respect?
- Who
is supporting teammates?
- Who
is showing self‑direction: manage turnovers and reset quickly.
Conclusion - TPSR Reflection
Teacher 2–3 questions:
- “Who
showed good respect today?”
- “What
was one thing you did to help your team?”
- “Where
else in school could you use the teamwork skills you used today?”
Student journals, or exit tickets:
- “How
did I show respect today?”
- “What
was my best moment of participation?”
- “How
did I help or encourage others?”
- “One
behaviour I can take to the classroom/playground is…”
Students each set a transfer goal for the day (e.g., “I
will encourage a classmate in maths by....”).
The synergy between TPSR and Play with Purpose (PwP) lies in how one model strengthens what the other might miss:
A. PwP provides the “education in sport” platform
B. TPSR adds a “responsibility and relationships” layer for “education
through sport”
Together -
PwP gives the practice design for high-quality game learning.
TPSR gives the social-emotional structure to shape positive behaviours
around that learning.
Ø Skill learning is purposeful, not
accidental
Ø Students are intentionally positioned as agentic learners
Ø Learning environments are intentionally cognitively demanding
The combination of PwP with TPSR features provides a humanistic, student-centred learning environment.
Related posts
Humanistic physical education click here
References
Aygun, Y., Boke, H., Yagin, F. H., Tufekci, S., Murathan, T., Gencay,
E., ... & Ardigò, L. P. (2024). Emotional and social outcomes of the
teaching personal and social responsibility model in physical education: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Children, 11(4),
459.
Hellison, D. (2011). Teaching responsibility through physical activity.
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics


Comments
Post a Comment