Using WebQuest as a teaching approach in physical education
In my last role in a secondary school, I had responsibility in my deputy principal position for the in-house teacher professional development that occurred twice a term as part of the teacher meeting program, as well as at two full day teacher PDs during the year. For a time, the PD was supported by Australian Government Quality Teacher Program (AGQTP) funding, which provided the means to also buy-in temp teachers to release our teachers for additional curriculum development work arising from the PD. This enabled teachers to implement, monitor and evaluate their curriculum innovations. Essentially, we were able to provide a form of teacher self-study. Our school AGQTP cluster focus was technology assisted learning. An innovation at that time was WebQuests. I first wrote about how to use a WebQuest in PE in the ACHPER(SA) 2005 publication: Pick Up and Run Volume 3: Even More ideas for Health and Physical Education. I think WebQuests continue to have utility in powering up student learning in physical education through directed learning that can complement, enrich or extend what is happening in class.
If you are not familiar with the pedagogy of a WebQuest,
these are the elements:
1.
Introduction: Provide a real-world
problem/scenario that has relevance to the student learning outcome/student
achievement standard for the Year (Grade) Level. (E.g., "You are the skill
acquisition consultant advising your physical education class volleyball unit
of work” – connects with AC: HPE student achievement standard element: Students
evaluate and refine their own and others’ movement skills and performances).
2.
Task: Provide a clear, achievable goal,
often involving a defined role and collaborative problem-solving (E.g., "Using
video analysis provide performance improvement advice to a player in your
class-team”).
3.
Template: Provide a template for the
final product that is being used to enable the student to demonstrate their
learning.
4.
Process: Detail step-by-step
instructions, and in the case of a group task, explain specific role responsibilities.
5.
Resources: Provide the links to teacher pre-selected,
reliable websites, videos, or databases for focused research that support the
student to be able to complete the task. Students use the links to learn about
the task and how to complete the task, completing teacher pre-prepared task sheets
or quizzes to scaffold their learning.
6.
Evaluation: Provide the rubric or
criteria list for assessing the final product (E.g., a report, presentation,
etc).
Noticeable from the WebQuest description is that the
teaching of the content needed to meet the task requirements is not by the
common teacher demonstrate-explain-student then practice and complete (DEP) pedagogy that is mainly Style A-Command and Style B-Practice. I reckon, as an inquiry-oriented
digital activity where students use internet resources to develop the skills,
knowledge and understanding to solve a problem, the WebQuest 6-steps above fits
the description of Style K-Convergent Discovery.
Research by Bloom and replicated by others (Bloom, 1984) showed
that an ‘average’ student under personal tutoring was about two standard
deviations above the average student of the control class taught conventionally.
This suggests the provision of personalised instruction provides the potential
for accelerated learning. In the absence of a tutor for every student in a
physical education class, perhaps the pedagogy of a WebQuest can provide the
personalised instruction in the sense that the student can work through the
learning progression without having to wait for the timing and pacing of the
teacher instruction to progress. Using a Webquest, the teacher moves from instructor (demonstrate-explain-practice pedagogy) and facilitator (use of questioning techniques) the role of knowledge navigator (Candy, 2000). I find this metaphor from Ellyard a useful way of thinking about the pedagogical shift.
“A sailboat may rely on the tide or current to carry it
to its destination or, sailing into the wind, use the wind to steer its course
in a desired direction.” (Ellyard, 2001)
The Sport Education model is well suited to embedding a WebQuest
for education about sport in secondary school physical education. Here is an
example of a task for a Year 10 SEM unit of work that incorporates a WebQuest to
scaffold the education about sport to complement the education in sport (game
development) and through sport (the personal and social responsibility learning)
associated with the three pillars of the Sport Education model: competent,
literate and enthusiastic participants.
Year 10 PE: "The Ultimate League"
WebQuest
Student achievement standard element: Apply and
evaluate approaches to collaboration and ethical behaviours across a range of
movement contexts.
1. The Scenario (Introduction)
Your team has been granted a franchise in the newly formed [insert
name of school] Ultimate League in [insert game/sport]. However, the
league board requires a "Club Prospectus" before you are given entry
to the competition. Your team must work together to build the club’s identity,
strategy, and statistical tracking systems.
2. The Task
As a team (group of 5–6), you will develop a digital Club
Prospectus outlining your sport literacy: that is, your functional use of
sport knowledge.
3. The Roles (Process)
Each student must choose a specialist role. The WebQuest
will provide specific links and resources for each:
|
Role |
Responsibility |
WebQuest Resource Provided |
|
Head Coach |
Develop a "Playbook" to develop with the team 3
offensive and 2 defensive set plays. |
E.g. Tactical whiteboard tools, online coaching resources
and YouTube coaching clinics. |
|
Statisticians |
Design a digital spreadsheet to track "Season
Leaders" (not just goals scored in games, but also assists, intercepts, and
demonstration of ‘club values’, etc.). |
E.g. Google Sheets templates, online readings such as
sports analytics blogs. |
|
Media Officer |
Create a "Season Launch" video or digital poster
and write a match report each week. |
E.g. Canva for Education and online media examples |
|
Officiating Lead |
Create a "Fair Play" charter and a simplified
rule sheet for the class. |
Official NSO (National Sporting Organisation) examples. |
4. Assessment Criteria
In this unit, you are assessed on three distinct
"Competencies":
- Competence
(The Player): Demonstrated ability to execute tactics during the
"Formal Competition" component of the season.
- Literacy:
The quality of the Club Prospectus.
- Enthusiasm:
Peer and teacher evaluation of your contribution to the
"Affiliation" (team culture) in pre-season development of the Prospectus,
in-season contribution to the team and the league, and
"Festivity" (celebrating the sport).
*These competencies will be discussed and explained in class
and illustrated by a detailed rubric which scaffolds the level of competency
achievement.
5. WebQuest Structure (The "Steps")
- Step
1: The Draft. Grouping and role selection.
- Step
2: Pre-Season Research. Use the provided links to research your role's
specific output.
- Step
3: The Build. Collaborative creation of the Prospectus (hosted on a
site like Google Sites or a shared Canva folder).
- Step
4: The Season. Accepted into the competition, execution of the season
where roles are performed.
- Step
5: The Grand Final & Awards. A culminating event where the Media
Officer presents the season highlights.
Thanks for stopping by and reading this post. If you would like to connect with me about a project to do with this blog or any of the other ideas that I have blogged about, you can contact me by the email link available here
References
ACHPER(SA) Ed. (2005). Pick Up and Run Volume 3: Even More ideas for Health and Physical Education. Author.
Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for
methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational
Researcher, 13(6), 4–16.
Candy, P. C. (2000). Knowledge navigators and lifelong
learners: Producing graduates for the information society. Higher
Education Research & Development, 19(3), 261-277.
Ellyard, P. (2001). Planning for thrival in a planetist
future: The challenge for knowledge management and for learning. Keynote
address to the ASLA XVII Conference, Mudjimba Beach, Queensland, October 2001.


Comments
Post a Comment